FORM 10-Q
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x |
|
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: |
For the quarterly period ended October 31, 2002
OR
¨ |
|
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: |
For the transition period from
to
Commission file number: 0-27756
Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
|
13-3648318
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
352 Knotter Drive, Cheshire, Connecticut 06410
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
203-272-2596
(Registrants
telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes x No ¨
Common Stock, $0.0001 par value
|
|
18,205,296 shares
|
Class |
|
Outstanding at December 1, 2002 |
ALEXION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
INDEX
|
|
Page
|
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
|
Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION |
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
18 |
Page 2 of 19
ALEXION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets (UNAUDITED)
(amounts in thousands)
|
|
October 31, 2002
|
|
|
July 31, 2002
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
20,204 |
|
|
$ |
47,574 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
263,254 |
|
|
|
261,010 |
|
Reimbursable contract costs |
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
863 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
2,326 |
|
|
|
1,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
286,081 |
|
|
|
310,784 |
|
Property, plant, and equipment, net |
|
|
15,110 |
|
|
|
14,874 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
19,954 |
|
|
|
19,954 |
|
Deferred financing costs, net |
|
|
2,549 |
|
|
|
2,692 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
6,009 |
|
|
|
5,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
329,703 |
|
|
$ |
354,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
8,262 |
|
|
|
9,843 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
4,826 |
|
|
|
4,303 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
921 |
|
|
|
2,627 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
14,555 |
|
|
|
17,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue, less current portion included above |
|
|
7,205 |
|
|
|
7,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note payable |
|
|
3,920 |
|
|
|
3,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible subordinated notes |
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock $.0001 par value; 5,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $.0001 par value; 145,000 shares authorized; 18,242 and 18,241 shares issued at October 31, 2002 and
July 31, 2002, respectively |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
385,222 |
|
|
|
385,197 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(202,439 |
) |
|
|
(180,799 |
) |
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
1,838 |
|
|
|
1,678 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost; 37 shares |
|
|
(600 |
) |
|
|
(600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
184,023 |
|
|
|
205,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
329,703 |
|
|
$ |
354,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
Page 3 of 19
ALEXION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Consolidated Statement of Operations
(UNAUDITED)
(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Three months ended October 31,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
CONTRACT RESEARCH REVENUES |
|
$ |
323 |
|
|
$ |
1,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
19,677 |
|
|
|
9,671 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
2,192 |
|
|
|
1,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
21,869 |
|
|
|
11,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(21,546 |
) |
|
|
(9,410 |
) |
|
OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income |
|
|
1,882 |
|
|
|
3,538 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(1,927 |
) |
|
|
(1,917 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss before provision for state income tax |
|
|
(21,591 |
) |
|
|
(7,789 |
) |
|
PROVISION FOR STATE INCOME TAX |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(21,640 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,789 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC AND DILUTED NET LOSS PER SHARE |
|
$ |
(1.19 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.43 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHARES USED IN COMPUTING BASIC AND DILUTED NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE |
|
|
18,204 |
|
|
|
18,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Page 4 of 19
ALEXION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (UNAUDITED)
(amounts in thousands)
|
|
Three months ended October 31,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(21,640 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,789 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
879 |
|
|
|
925 |
|
Compensation expense related to grant of stock options |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Change in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reimbursable contract costs |
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
(187 |
) |
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
(989 |
) |
|
|
171 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(1,581 |
) |
|
|
(509 |
) |
Accrued expenses |
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
1,105 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
(1,706 |
) |
|
|
(1,725 |
) |
Deferred revenue |
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(24,323 |
) |
|
|
(8,027 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of marketable securities |
|
|
(38,992 |
) |
|
|
(214,206 |
) |
Proceeds from marketable securities |
|
|
36,908 |
|
|
|
207,618 |
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(972 |
) |
|
|
(443 |
) |
Net cash paid in acquisition of Prolifaron |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(3,056 |
) |
|
|
(7,055 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
(27,370 |
) |
|
|
(15,030 |
) |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period |
|
|
47,574 |
|
|
|
135,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period |
|
$ |
20,204 |
|
|
$ |
120,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest expense |
|
$ |
3,509 |
|
|
$ |
3,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
Page 5 of 19
ALEXION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
1. |
|
Organization and Operations - |
Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Alexion or the Company) was organized in 1992 and is engaged in the development of therapeutic products for the treatment of a wide array of severe diseases, including
cardiovascular, autoimmune, and hematologic disorders, inflammation, and cancer.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements
include Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Alexion Antibody Technologies (AAT) and Columbus Farming Corporation (Columbus). All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation. Columbus was formed on February 9, 1999 to acquire certain manufacturing assets from United States Surgical Corporation (US Surgical).
The consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
and include, in the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal, recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of interim period results. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The results for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of results to be
expected for any future period. These consolidated condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended
July 31, 2002. The year end balance sheet data presented does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
2. |
|
Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals Collaboration - |
The Company and Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals (P&G) entered into an exclusive collaboration in January 1999 to develop and commercialize pexelizumab. The Company granted P&G
an exclusive license to the Companys intellectual property related to pexelizumab, with the right to sublicense. P&G originally agreed to fund generally all clinical development and manufacturing costs relating to pexelizumab for the
treatment of inflammation caused by cardiopulmonary bypass surgery, heart attack, and angioplasty (see below). Additionally, P&G agreed to pay the Company up to $95 million in payments, which included a non-refundable up-front $10 million
license fee, milestone payments (including up to $33 million in milestone payments for achievement of certain sales thresholds), and research and development support payments. The Company was also to receive royalties on worldwide sales of
pexelizumab, if any, for all indications. The Company was to retain a preferred position relative to third-party manufacturers to manufacture pexelizumab worldwide. The Company was to share co-promotion rights with P&G to sell, market and
distribute pexelizumab in the United States (U.S.), and granted P&G the exclusive rights to sell, market and distribute pexelizumab outside of the U.S.
In December 2001, the Company and P&G entered into a binding memorandum of understanding (MOU) pursuant to which they revised their January 1999 collaboration. Under the revised
structure per the MOU, the Company and P&G will share decision-making and responsibility for all future U.S. development and commercialization costs for pexelizumab, including clinical, manufacturing, marketing, and sales efforts. Prior to
December 2001, P&G was generally funding all clinical development and manufacturing costs for pexelizumab. The revised collaboration per the MOU provides that the Company and P&G each incur approximately 50% of all Phase III clinical trial,
product development and manufacturing, and commercialization costs necessary for the potential approval and marketing of pexelizumab in the U.S. and that the Company will receive approximately 50% of the gross margin on U.S. sales, if any. The
Company has agreed to bear the first 50% of projected costs associated with the U.S. coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) Phase III clinical trial costs and P&G will bear the second 50%, with a final adjustment to make
even the 50% sharing costs. The Company and P&G have agreed that each will share concurrently 50% of the ongoing U.S. pre-production and development manufacturing costs for pexelizumab. P&G
Page 6 of 19
ALEXION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
agreed to retain responsibility for future development and commercialization costs outside
the U.S., with the Company receiving a royalty on sales to the rest of the world, if any. The Company is responsible for royalties on certain third party intellectual property worldwide, if such intellectual property is necessary. Additionally, as
part of the MOU, the Company will receive milestone payments for achieving specified development steps, regulatory filings and approvals, but will not receive previously agreed sales milestones and will generally forego further research and
development support payments from P&G.
P&G has the right to terminate the collaboration at any time. If P&G terminates prior
to incurring its 50% of the CABG-Phase III clinical trial costs, then P&G will not be required to contribute towards its approximately equal share of the U.S. CABG-Phase III clinical trial costs and P&G will be released from its future
funding obligations. In such circumstance, all rights and the exclusive license to the Companys intellectual property related to pexelizumab will revert back to the Company and the Company will be entitled to all future pexelizumab revenues,
if any, without any sharing of revenues, if any, with P&G.
As part of the revised collaboration per the MOU, P&G agreed to
continue to fund 100% of the costs to complete the two acute myocardial infarction (AMI) Phase II clinical trials in myocardial infarction (heart attack) patients that completed enrollment. The Company and P&G have agreed
that each will share concurrently 50% of any future AMI-Phase III clinical trial costs.
3. |
|
Net Loss Per Common Share - |
The Company computes and presents net loss per common share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share. Basic net loss per common share is based on the weighted average shares of common stock outstanding during
the period. Diluted net loss per common share assumes in addition to the above, the dilutive effect of common share equivalents outstanding during the period. Common share equivalents represent dilutive stock options and convertible subordinated
debt. These outstanding stock options and convertible subordinated debt entitled holders to acquire 4,745,841 and 4,688,175 shares of common stock at October 31, 2002 and 2001, respectfully. There is no difference in basic and diluted net loss per
common share for the three months ended October 31, 2002 and 2001 as the effect of common share equivalents is anti-dilutive.
Contract research revenues recorded by the Company consist of research and development support payments and license fees under collaborations with third parties and amounts received under various government grants.
Up-front, non-refundable license fees received in connection with a collaboration are deferred and amortized into revenue based upon the terms of each
collaborative arrangement.
Revenues derived from the achievement of milestones are recognized when the milestone is achieved, provided
that the milestone is substantive and a culmination of the earnings process has occurred. Research and development support revenues are recognized as the related work is performed and expenses are incurred under the terms of the contracts for
development activities.
Reimbursable contract costs as shown on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets represent reimbursable
costs incurred in connection with research contracts. The Company bills these costs and recognizes the costs and related revenues in accordance with the terms of the contracts.
Deferred revenue results from cash received or amounts receivable in advance of revenue recognition under research and development contracts.
Page 7 of 19
ALEXION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Through October 31, 2002, the Company had received proceeds of approximately $50.8 million
from P&G. These proceeds included the non-refundable up-front license fee of $10 million in fiscal 1999 and $40.8 million for research and development support expenses, including a milestone payment of $2 million for initiation of the CABG-Phase
III trial.
The Company has been awarded various grants by agencies of the U.S. government to fund specific research projects. These
projects were substantially complete as of October 31, 2002, and the Company has no significant additional funding available under these grants.
A summary of revenues generated from contract research collaboration, milestone payment, and grant awards is as follows for the three months ended October 31 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
Three months ended October 31,
|
|
|
2002
|
|
2001
|
Collaboration/Grant Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
P&G |
|
$ |
170 |
|
$ |
1,328 |
U.S. government grants |
|
|
153 |
|
|
519 |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
323 |
|
$ |
1,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. |
|
Convertible Subordinated Notes - |
In March 2000, the Company completed a $120 million private placement of 5.75% Convertible Subordinated Notes due March 15, 2007. The notes bear interest payable semi-annually on September 15 and March 15 of each year,
beginning September 15, 2000. The holders may convert all or a portion of the notes into common stock at any time on or before March 15, 2007 at a conversion price of $106.425 per share resulting in the issuance of 1,127,555 shares of common stock,
in aggregate. The Company incurred interest expense of approximately $1.7 million for the three months ended October 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively, related to these notes.
The Company incurred deferred financing costs related to this offering of approximately $4.0 million, which are recorded in the consolidated balance sheet and are being amortized as a component of
interest expense over the seven-year term of the notes. Amortization expense associated with the financing costs was approximately $143,000 for the three months ended October 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
6. |
|
Comprehensive Income (Loss) - |
The Company reports and presents comprehensive income (loss) in accordance with SFAS No. 130 Reporting Comprehensive Income which establishes standards for reporting and display of comprehensive income (loss) and its
components in a full set of general purpose financial statements. The objective of the statement is to report a measure of all changes in equity of an enterprise that result form transactions and other economic events of the period other than
transactions with owners (comprehensive income (loss)). The Companys other comprehensive income (loss) arises from net unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities. The Company has elected to display comprehensive income (loss) as a
component of the statements of stockholders equity and comprehensive loss.
Page 8 of 19
ALEXION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
A summary of total comprehensive loss is as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
Three months ended October 31,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(21,640 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,789 |
) |
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
2,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(21,480 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. |
|
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements - |
In June 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (SFAS 146). This
Statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 94-3, Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and
Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring). The provisions of SFAS No. 146 are effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002, with early application encouraged.
Management believes the adoption of this new standard will not have a material impact on either the operating results or financial position of the Company.
Page 9 of 19
ALEXION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This report contains forward-looking statements which involve risks and uncertainties. Such statements are subject to certain factors which may cause our plans and results to differ significantly from plans and results discussed
in forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in Risk Factors Exhibit 99.2 in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended October 31, 2002. The interim financial statements and this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and Notes thereto for the fiscal
year ended July 31, 2002 and the related Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations, both of which are contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2002.
Overview
We
are engaged in the discovery and development of therapeutic products aimed at treating patients with a wide array of severe disease states, including cardiovascular, autoimmune, and hematologic disorders, inflammation and cancer. Since our inception
in January 1992, we have devoted substantially all of our resources to drug discovery, research, and product and clinical development. Additionally, through our wholly owned subsidiary, Alexion Antibody Technologies, Inc., or AAT, we are engaged in
the discovery and development of a portfolio of additional antibody therapeutics targeting severe unmet medical needs.
Our two lead
product candidates are antibodies that address specific diseases that arise when the human immune system attacks the human body itself and produces undesired inflammation. Antibodies are proteins that bind specifically to selected targets, or
antigens, in the body. After the antibody binds to its target, it may activate the bodys immune system against the target, block activities of the target or stimulate activities of the target.
One of our antibody product candidates, pexelizumab, is an antibody fragment under development in collaboration with Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, or
P&G, in acute cardiovascular disorders. Pexelizumab is currently in evaluation in a pivotal Phase III trial, PRIMO-CABG, in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery, or CABG, with cardiopulmonary bypass, or CPB. This study, which
is expected to involve approximately 3,000 patients, is enrolling according to schedule. Also in collaboration with P&G, we conducted two Phase II clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction or heart attack patients: one study in patients
receiving angioplasty, a procedure for opening up narrowed or blocked arteries that supply blood to the heart, the COMMA study, and the other in patients receiving thrombolytic therapy, a procedure for dissolving clots that block heart vessels, the
COMPLY study. Results from both studies were reported at the November 2002 annual meeting of the American Heart Association. In both studies, the primary endpoint of infarct, or death of heart muscle, size reduction was not reached, however in the
COMMA study pexelizumab treatment was associated with a significant, dose dependent reduction in mortality.
Our other lead antibody
product candidate, eculizumab, is in clinical development for the treatment of a variety of chronic autoimmune diseases. We are completing enrollment in an ongoing Phase IIb study with eculizumab in rheumatoid arthritis patients. In November 2002,
results were reported at the American Society of Nephrology annual meeting from two clinical trials evaluating eculizumab in membranous nephritis patients, a kidney disease. Results from the first, randomized, placebo controlled double blind, study
showed that eculizumab was well tolerated but did not reach its primary clinical efficacy endpoint of proteinuria, or abnormal loss of substantial amounts of protein in a patients urine, reduction after four months of therapy. In the second
study, both placebo and eculizumab treated patients from the four month study were treated for an additional 12 months with eculizumab therapy. In this study, eculizumab was well tolerated and associated with an increased remission rate at 12 months
and with significant improvements in proteinuria and other important components of nephrotic syndrome.
Eculizumab is also under
evaluation in an open label Phase I pilot study in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria or PNH patients. PNH is a rare blood disease characterized by severe anemia and risk of blood clotting or thrombosis. Results from this study will be presented at
the American Society of Hematology meeting in December 2002.
Page 10 of 19
ALEXION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Through AAT, our wholly owned subsidiary with extensive combinatorial human and humanized
antibody library technologies and expertise, we have developed important additional capabilities to discover and develop additional antibody product candidates for the treatment of inflammatory diseases and cancer. We have also developed therapies
employing the transplantation of cells from other species into humans, known as xenotransplantation.
To date, we have not received any
revenues from the sale of our products. We have incurred operating losses since our inception. As of October 31, 2002, we had an accumulated deficit of $202.4 million. We expect to incur substantial and increasing operating losses for the next
several years due to expenses associated with product research and development, pre-clinical studies and clinical testing, regulatory activities, manufacturing development, scale-up and commercial manufacturing and developing a sales and marketing
force and we may need to obtain additional financing to cover these costs.
We plan to develop and commercialize on our own those product
candidates for which the clinical trials and commercialization requirements can be funded and accomplished by our own resources. For those products which require greater resources, our strategy is to form corporate partnerships with major
pharmaceutical companies for product development and commercialization, where we will still play a major role.
In December 2001, we and
P&G entered into a binding memorandum of understanding, or MOU, pursuant to which we and P&G revised our January 1999 collaboration. Under the revised structure, we and P&G share decision-making and responsibility for all future United
States, or U.S., development and commercialization costs for pexelizumab, including clinical, manufacturing, marketing, and sales efforts. Prior to December 2001, P&G was generally funding all clinical development and manufacturing costs for
pexelizumab. Per the MOU, our revised collaboration with P&G provides for us and P&G to each incur approximately 50% of all Phase III clinical trial, product development and manufacturing, and commercialization costs necessary for the
potential approval and marketing of pexelizumab in the U.S. and that we will receive approximately 50% of the gross margin on U.S. sales, if any. P&G agreed to retain responsibility and costs for future development and commercialization costs
outside the U.S., with us receiving a royalty on sales to the rest of the world, if any. We are responsible for royalties on certain third party intellectual property worldwide, if such intellectual property is necessary. Additionally, as part of
the MOU, we will receive milestone payments for achieving development steps, regulatory filings and approvals, but will not receive previously agreed sales milestones and will generally forego further research and development support payments from
P&G.
As part of the revised collaboration per the MOU, P&G agreed to continue to fund 100% of the costs for the two recently
completed Phase II clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction, AMI or heart attack, patients. We have agreed to bear the first 50% of projected costs associated with the coronary artery bypass graft or CABG-Phase III clinical trial and P&G
will bear the second 50%, with a final adjustment to make even the 50% sharing of costs. We and P&G have agreed that each will share concurrently 50% of the on-going U.S. pre-production and development manufacturing costs of pexelizumab as well
as any future AMI-Phase III clinical trial costs.
P&G has the right to terminate the collaboration at any time. If P&G
terminates prior to incurring its 50% of the CABG-Phase III clinical trial costs, then P&G will not be required to contribute towards its approximately equal share of the U.S. CABG-Phase III clinical trial costs and P&G will be released from
its future funding obligations. In such circumstance, all rights and the exclusive license to our intellectual property related to pexelizumab will revert back to us and we will be entitled to all future pexelizumab revenues, if any, without any
sharing of revenues, if any, with P&G.
The preparation of financial statements requires us to make estimates, assumptions and
judgements that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to intangible assets;
collaborative, royalty and license arrangements; and other contingencies. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form our basis
for making judgements about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Page 11 of 19
ALEXION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments
and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:
Revenues We record
contract research revenues from research and development support payments, license fees and milestone payments under collaboration with third parties, and amounts received from various government grants. Up-front, non-refundable license fees
received in connection with a collaboration are deferred and amortized into revenue over the life of the agreement or underlying technologies. Revenues derived from the achievement of milestones are recognized when the milestone is achieved,
provided that the milestone is substantive and a culmination of the earnings process has occurred. Research and development support revenues are recognized as the related work is performed and expenses are incurred under the terms of the contracts
for development activities. Revenues derived from the achievement of milestones or recognition of related work when performed under terms of a contract may cause our operating results to vary considerably from period to period. Deferred revenue
results from cash received or amounts receivable in advance of revenue recognition under research and development contracts.
Research and development expenses We record research and development expenses when they are incurred unless recoverable under contract. Research and development expenses include the following major types of costs: salaries and
benefit costs, research license fees and various contractor costs, depreciation and amortization of lab facilities and leasehold improvements, building and utilities costs related to research space, and lab supplies.
Goodwill, net At July 31, 2002, we carry $20.0 million of goodwill, net, acquired in connection with our acquisition of Prolifaron,
representing the excess cost over fair value of the net assets acquired. On a prospective basis, this goodwill or any long-lived investment asset is subject to annual impairment reviews. Impairment charges, if any, will be recorded as a component of
operating expenses in the period in which the impairment is determined, if any.
Results of Operations
A summary of revenues generated from contract research collaboration, milestone payment, and grant awards is as follows for the three months ended October 31
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
Three months ended October 31,
|
|
|
2002
|
|
2001
|
Collaboration/Grant Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
P&G |
|
$ |
170 |
|
$ |
1,328 |
U.S. government grants |
|
|
153 |
|
|
519 |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Research Revenues |
|
$ |
323 |
|
$ |
1,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended October 31, 2002
Compared with Three Months ended October 31, 2001
We
earned contract research revenues of $323,000 for the three months ended October 31, 2002 and $1.9 million for the same period ended October 31, 2001. The $1.6 million decrease resulted primarily from the decreased research and development support
payments from P&G as compared to the same period a year ago and the reduction in grant reimbursable billings from our various government grants. Decreased research and development support payments resulted principally from our revised
collaboration with P&G during the quarter ended January 31, 2002 (see preceding section, Overview).
Page 12 of 19
ALEXION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
We incurred research and development expenses of $19.7 million for the three months ended
October 31, 2002 and $9.7 million for the three months ended October 31, 2001. The $10.0 million increase resulted primarily from ongoing pexelizumab CABG Phase III clinical trial costs incurred. Also contributing were eculizumab clinical trial
costs, increased manufacturing costs associated with our lead C5 inhibitor candidates, pexelizumab and eculizumab, and increased payroll costs. Prior to December 2001, P&G was generally funding all clinical development and manufacturing costs
for pexelizumab. Our revised collaboration (see preceding section, Overview) provides for us and P&G to each incur approximately 50% of all Phase III clinical trial, product development and manufacturing costs for pexelizumab. In addition, as
part of our revised collaboration, we and P&G agreed that we would bear the first 50% of the ongoing PRIMO-CABG Phase III clinical trial costs and P&G will bear the second 50%.
Our general and administrative expenses were $2.2 million for the three months ended October 31, 2002 and $1.6 million for the three months ended October 31, 2001. This increase resulted principally
from higher personnel costs associated with providing support to the various research and development departments.
Total operating
expenses were $21.9 million and $11.3 million for the three months ended October 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
Investment income was
$1.9 million for the three months ended October 31, 2002 and $3.5 million for the three months ended October 31, 2001. The decrease in investment income of $1.6 million resulted primarily from lower cash balances and lower market interest rates.
Interest expense, primarily on our $120 million convertible subordinated notes, was $1.9 million for the quarters ended October 31, 2001 and 2002.
As a result of Connecticut legislation passed in July 2002, effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2002, companies are required to pay on an annual basis a minimum of 30% of the capital base component of their
Connecticut corporation business tax, notwithstanding available tax credit carry-forwards. Therefore, for the three months ended October 31, 2002, a provision for the capital base tax of $49,000 was recorded.
As a result of the above factors, we incurred a net loss of $21.6 million or $1.19 basic and diluted net loss per common share for the three months ended October
31, 2002 compared to a net loss of $7.8 million or $0.43 basic and diluted net loss per common share for the three months ended October 31, 2001.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of October 31, 2002, cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities was
$283.5 million compared with $308.6 million at July 31, 2002. The decrease was primarily due to funding our operating activities.
Net
cash used in operating activities for the three months ended October 31, 2002 was $24.3 million. This consisted primarily of our net loss of $21.6 million, an increase in prepaid expenses of $1.0 million and a decrease in accounts payable and
accrued interest of $3.3 million.
Net cash used in investing activities for the three months ended October 31, 2002 was $3.1 million.
This included $2.1 million of purchases of marketable securities, net of maturities, and $1.0 million of property, plant and equipment additions.
We anticipate that our existing capital resources together with the anticipated funding from our revised collaboration with P&G, as well as the addition of our interest and investment income earned on available cash and
marketable securities should provide us adequate resources to fund our operating expenses and capital requirements as currently planned for at least the next twenty-four months. This should also provide us adequate funding for the clinical testing
and manufacturing of our C5 Inhibitor product candidates and support for our broad research and development of our additional product candidates. We are currently conducting several clinical trials, including the PRIMO-CABG trial. Funding needs may
shift between programs and potentially accelerate and increase if we initiate new pivotal trials for our product candidates, including any pivotal clinical trial of pexilizumab for acute myocardial infarction, or heart attack, patients undergoing
angioplasty, a procedure for opening up narrowed or blocked arteries that supply blood to the heart.
Page 13 of 19
ALEXION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Our contractual obligations and commercial commitments consists principally of our $120
million of convertible subordinated notes, a $3.9 million note payable, and our annual payments of approximately $1.6 million for operating leases principally for facilities and equipment. We have no outstanding capital leases. We have
cancelable research and development and clinical and manufacturing development cost commitments along with anticipated supporting arrangements, subject to certain limitations and cancellation clauses, aggregating approximately $47.1 million over the
next three years. These obligations, commitments and supporting arrangements represent payments based on current operating forecasts, which are subject to changes. And, if and when we achieve specified contractual milestones related to product
development and product license applications and approvals, additional payments would be required if we elect to continue and maintain our licenses with our licensors, aggregating up to $24.2 million.
Interest on our $120 million 5.75% convertible subordinated notes due March 15, 2007 is payable semi-annually in September and March of each year. The holders
may convert all or a portion of the notes into common stock any time on or before March 15, 2007 at a conversion price of $106.425 per common share. Beginning March 20, 2003, we may redeem some or all of the notes per the declining redemption prices
listed for the notes. We may also elect to pay the repurchase price for some or all the notes in cash or common stock. Our 5.75% convertible subordinated notes due March 2007 are trading at a discount to its face amount. Accordingly, in order to
reduce future cash interest payments, as well as future payments due at maturity; we may, from time to time, depending on market conditions, repurchase some of our outstanding convertible debt for cash; exchange debt for shares of our common stock,
preferred stock, debt or other consideration; or a combination of any of the foregoing. If Alexion exchanges shares of its capital stock, or securities convertible into or exercisable for its capital stock, for outstanding convertible debt, the
number of shares that it might issue as a result of such exchanges would significantly exceed that number of shares originally issuable upon conversion of such debt and, accordingly, such exchanges could result in material dilution to holders of
Alexions common stock. There can be no assurance that Alexion will repurchase or exchange any outstanding convertible debt.
Interest on our $3.9 million note payable due in May 2005, bearing interest at 6% per annum, is payable quarterly. This note payable was used to finance certain manufacturing assets acquired in February 1999, principally land,
buildings and laboratory equipment, for the xenograft program developed by Tyco Healthcare, formerly known as U.S. Surgical Corporation. The principal balance under the note is due in May 2005. Security for this term note is the manufacturing assets
that we purchased. We are looking to leverage our opportunities in this program as we complete optimization of manufacturing methods for the UniGraft cells/tissue to enable clinical development. If we are unable to secure a collaboration partner to
share in the future funding of the development and clinical trials, we may be unable to maximize the value in this program; and subsequently, may have to reduce our financial commitment to the program. This may cause a delay or termination of our
UniGraft program, and impairment to our UniGraft manufacturing assets resulting in a write down of a portion of those assets. As of October 31, 2002, the carrying value of those assets was approximately $4 million.
We expect to continue to operate at a net loss for at least the next several years as we continue our research and development efforts and continue to conduct
clinical trials and develop manufacturing, sales, marketing and distribution capabilities. Our operating expenses will depend on many factors, including:
|
|
|
the progress, timing and scope of our research and development programs; |
|
|
|
the progress, timing and scope of our preclinical studies and clinical trials; |
|
|
|
the time and cost necessary to obtain regulatory approvals; the time and cost necessary to further develop manufacturing processes, arrange for contract
manufacturing or build manufacturing facilities and obtain the necessary regulatory approvals for those facilities; |
|
|
|
the time and cost necessary to develop sales, marketing and distribution capabilities; |
|
|
|
changes in applicable governmental regulatory policies; and |
|
|
|
any new collaborative, licensing and other commercial relationships that we may establish. |
We expect to incur substantial additional costs for research, pre-clinical and clinical testing, manufacturing process development,
additional capital expenditures related to personnel and facilities expansion, clinical and commercial
Page 14 of 19
ALEXION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
manufacturing requirements, secure commercial contract manufacturing capacity, and marketing and sales in order to commercialize our
products currently under development. Furthermore, we will owe royalties to parties we have licensed intellectual property from, or may in the future license intellectual property from, in connection with the development, manufacture or sale or our
products.
In addition to milestone payments we may receive from our collaboration with P&G and our interest and investment income
that are subject to market interest rate fluctuations, we will need to raise or generate substantial additional funding in order to complete the development and commercialization of all of our product candidates. Furthermore, the development or
expansion of our business or any acquired business or companies may require a substantial capital investment by us. Our additional financing may include public or private debt or equity offerings, equity line facilities, bank loans, collaborative
research and development arrangements with corporate partners, and/or the sale or licensing of some of our property. There can be no assurance that funds will be available on terms acceptable to us, if at all, or that discussions with potential
strategic or collaborative partners will result in any agreements on a timely basis, if at all. The unavailability of additional financing when and if required could require us to delay, scale back or eliminate certain research and product
development programs or to license third parties to commercialize products or technologies that we would otherwise undertake ourselves, any of which could have a material adverse effect.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risks.
We account for our
marketable securities in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities (SFAS 115). All of the cash equivalents and marketable securities
are treated as available-for-sale under SFAS 115.
Investments in fixed rate interest earning instruments carry a degree of interest
risk. Fixed rate securities may have their fair market value adversely impacted due to a rise in interest rates. Due in part to these factors, our future investment income may fall short of expectations due to changes in interest rates or we may
suffer losses in principal if forced to sell securities which have seen a decline in market value due to changes in interest rates. Our marketable securities are held for purposes other than trading and we believe that we currently have no material
adverse risk exposure. The marketable securities as of October 31, 2002, had maturities of less than two years. The weighted-average interest rate on marketable securities at October 31, 2002 was approximately 2.0%. The fair value of marketable
securities held at October 31, 2002 was $263.3 million.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Within the 90 days prior to the date of this report,
our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Operating Officer (our principal financial officer), carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 13a-14. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Operating Officer (our principal financial officer) concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in alerting them to material
information, on a timely basis, required to be included in our periodic SEC filings. There have been no significant changes in our internal controls or in factors which could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date our
management carried out its evaluation. It should be noted that the design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in
achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote. In addition, we reviewed our internal controls, and there have been no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect those controls subsequent to the date of their last evaluation.
Page 15 of 19
ALEXION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports
(a) Exhibits
99.1 Statement pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
99.2 Risk Factors
(b) Form 8-K
No reports on Form 8-K have been filed during the quarter for which this report is filed.
Page 16 of 19
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
ALEXION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. |
|
Date: December 9, 2002 |
|
|
|
By: |
|
/S/ LEONARD BELL, M.D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leonard Bell, M.D. Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
(principal executive officer) |
|
Date: December 9, 2002 |
|
|
|
By: |
|
/S/ DAVID W. KEISER
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David W. Keiser President and Chief Operating Officer (principal financial officer) |
|
Date: December 9, 2002 |
|
|
|
By: |
|
/S/ BARRY P. LUKE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barry P. Luke Vice President of Finance and Administration
(principal accounting officer) |
Page 17 of 19
I, Leonard Bell, M.D., certify that:
|
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: |
|
a) |
|
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; |
|
b) |
|
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly
report (the Evaluation Date); and |
|
c) |
|
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date; |
|
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): |
|
a) |
|
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
|
b) |
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have significant role in the registrants internal controls; and
|
|
6. |
|
The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
|
|
Date: December 9, 2002 |
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ LEONARD BELL, M.D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leonard Bell, M.D. Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) |
Page 18 of 19
CERTIFICATIONS
I, David W. Keiser, certify that:
|
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: |
|
a. |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; |
|
b. |
|
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly
report (the Evaluation Date); and |
|
c. |
|
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date; |
|
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): |
|
a. |
|
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
|
b. |
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have significant role in the registrants internal controls; and
|
|
6. |
|
The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
|
|
Date: December 9, 2002 |
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ DAVID W. KEISER
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David W. Keiser President and Chief Operating Officer (principal financial officer) |
Page 19 of 19
CERTIFICATIONS
Exhibit 99.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with
the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended October 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned,
Leonard Bell M.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
|
(1) |
|
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|
(2) |
|
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
|
Date: December 9, 2002 |
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ LEONARD BELL, M.D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leonard Bell, M.D. Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) |
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
Company) for the period ended October 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, David W. Keiser, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
|
(1) |
|
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|
(2) |
|
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
|
Date: December 9, 2002 |
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ DAVID W. KEISER
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David W. Keiser President and Chief Operating Officer (principal financial officer) |
RISK FACTORS
Exhibit 99.2
RISK FACTORS
The following risk factors should be carefully
considered in evaluating our Company and our business because these risk factors have a significant impact on our business, operating results, financial condition, and cash flows. If any of these risks actually occurs, our business, financial
condition, operating results and/or cash flows could be harmed.
If we continue to incur operating losses, we may be unable to
continue our operations.
We have incurred losses since we started our company in January 1992. As of July 31, 2002, we had an
accumulated deficit of approximately $180.8 million. If we continue to incur operating losses and fail to become a profitable company, we may be unable to continue our operations. Since we began our business, we have focused on research and
development of product candidates. We have no products that are available for sale and do not know when we will have products available for sale, if ever. We expect to continue to operate at a net loss for at least the next several years as we
continue our research and development efforts, continue to conduct clinical trials and develop manufacturing, sales, marketing and distribution capabilities. Our future profitability depends on our receiving regulatory approval of our product
candidates and our ability to successfully manufacture and market approved drugs. The extent and the timing of our future losses and our profitability, if we are ever profitable, are highly uncertain.
If we do not obtain regulatory approval for our drug products, we will not be able to sell our drug products.
We cannot sell or market our drugs without regulatory approval. If we do not obtain regulatory approval for our products, the value of our company and our
results of operations will be harmed. In the United States, we must obtain approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, for each drug that we intend to sell. Obtaining FDA approval is typically a lengthy and expensive process, and
approval is highly uncertain. Foreign governments also regulate drugs distributed outside the United States, whose approval can also be lengthy, expensive and highly uncertain. None of our product candidates has received regulatory approval to be
marketed and sold in the United States or any other country. We may not receive regulatory approval of any of our product candidates, if ever, for at least the next several years.
If our drug trials are delayed or achieve unfavorable results, we will have to delay or may be unable to obtain regulatory approval for our products.
We must conduct extensive testing of our product candidates before we can obtain regulatory approval for our products. We need to conduct both preclinical animal
testing and clinical trials. These tests and trials may not achieve favorable results. We would need to reevaluate any drug that did not test favorably and either alter the study, the drug or the dose and perform additional or repeat tests, or
abandon the drug development project. In those circumstances, we would not be able to obtain regulatory approval on a timely basis, if ever. Even if approval is granted, the approval may require limitations on the indicated uses for which the drug
may be marketed.
We have announced the completion of a Phase IIb trial of pexelizumab, one of our two lead antibody product candidates,
for the treatment of complications in patients after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery, including the reduction of the frequency and severity of myocardial infarctions, or heart attacks and frequency of death. The primary therapeutic exploratory
pre-set goal of the trial, referred to as the primary endpoint, was not achieved. However, in the pre-specified population that included approximately 90% of the patient population, the 800 patients who had coronary artery bypass graft surgery
without valve surgery, those that received pexelizumab at the highest dose level experienced a significant reduction in larger post-surgical heart attacks. Based on these results, in January 2002, we commenced enrollment of a pivotal Phase III
clinical trial of pexelizumab in approximately 3,000 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass operations. The Phase III trial will assess the safety and efficacy of pexelizumab in reducing the combined
incidence of death or myocardial infarction in this patient population. We cannot assure you that this trial will be successful or that any of the endpoints of the trial will be achieved.
We have also announced the completion of
a Phase II trial of eculizumab, our other lead antibody product candidate, for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. The primary endpoint, or therapeutic pre-set goal, for this trial was met by the group of patients who received the mid-level
dosing regimen of eculizumab. Patients who received higher or lower doses of eculizumab in the clinical trial did not achieve the primary endpoint.
Completion of these and other trials does not guarantee that we will initiate additional trials for our product candidates, that if the trials are initiated what the scope and phase of the trial will
be or that they will be completed, or that if the trials are completed, the results will provide a sufficient basis to proceed with further trials or to apply for or receive regulatory approvals or to commercialize products. Results of trials could
be inconclusive, requiring additional or repeat trials.
There are many reasons why drug testing could be delayed
or terminated. For human trials, patients must be recruited and each product candidate must be tested at various doses and formulations for each clinical indication. Also, to ensure safety and effectiveness, the effect of drugs often must be studied
over a long period of time, especially for the chronic diseases that we are studying. Unfavorable results or insufficient patient enrollment in our clinical trials could delay or cause us to abandon a product development program.
Additional factors that can cause delay or termination of our clinical trials include:
|
|
|
slow patient enrollment; |
|
|
|
long treatment time required to demonstrate effectiveness; |
|
|
|
lack of sufficient supplies of the product candidate; |
|
|
|
adverse medical events or side effects in treated patients; |
|
|
|
lack of effectiveness of the product candidate being tested; and |
|
|
|
lack of sufficient funds. |
We may expand our business through new acquisitions that could disrupt our business and harm our financial condition.
Our business strategy includes expanding our products and capabilities, and we may seek acquisitions to do so. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including:
|
|
|
substantial cash expenditures; |
|
|
|
potentially dilutive issuance of equity securities; |
-1-
|
|
|
incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities, some of which may be difficult or impossible to identify at the time of acquisition;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in assimilating the operations of the acquired companies; |
|
|
|
diverting our managements attention away from other business concerns; |
|
|
|
risks of entering markets in which we have limited or no direct experience; and |
|
|
|
the potential loss of our key employees or key employees of the acquired companies. |
We cannot assure you that any acquisition will result in long-term benefits to us. We may incorrectly judge the value or worth of an acquired company or business. In
addition, our future success would depend in part on our ability to manage the rapid growth associated with some of these acquisitions. We cannot assure you that we will be able to make the combination of our business with that of acquired
businesses or companies work or be successful. Furthermore, the development or expansion of our business or any acquired business or companies may require a substantial capital investment by us. We may not have these necessary funds nor may they be
readily available to us on acceptable terms or at all. We may also seek to raise funds by selling shares of our stock, which could dilute your ownership interest in our company.
On September 22, 2000, we purchased all of the capital stock and other outstanding securities of Prolifaron, Inc., a privately held biopharmaceutical company that is
developing therapeutic antibodies addressing multiple diseases, including cancer, for approximately 400,000 shares of our outstanding capital stock. The business of Prolifaron, now our wholly-owned subsidiary, Alexion Antibody Technologies, Inc., or
AAT, is subject to many of the same risks that our business is subject to. We cannot assure you that AAT will successfully develop any products or that we will realize any benefits from the acquisition of Prolifaron
If we fail to obtain the capital necessary to fund our operations, we will be unable to continue or complete our product development.
We believe we have sufficient capital to fund our operations and product development for at least twenty-four
months. We may need to raise additional capital after that time to complete the development and commercialization of our product candidates. We are currently conducting several clinical trials, including the PRIMO-CABG trial. Funding needs may shift
between programs and potentially accelerate and increase if we initiate new pivotal trials for our product candidates, including any pivotal clinical trial of pexilizumab for acute myocardial infarction, or heart attack, patients undergoing
angioplasty, a procedure for opening up narrowed or blocked arteries that supply blood to the heart.
Additional
financing could take the form of public or private debt or equity offerings, equity line facilities, bank loans collaborative research and development arrangements with corporate partners and/or the sale or licensing of some of our property. The
amount of capital we may need depends on many factors, including:
|
|
|
the existence, terms and status of collaborative arrangements and strategic partnerships, such as our collaboration with Procter & Gamble;
|
-2-
|
|
|
the progress, timing and scope of our research and development programs; |
|
|
|
the progress, timing and scope of our preclinical studies and clinical trials; |
|
|
|
the time and cost necessary to obtain regulatory approvals; |
|
|
|
the time and cost necessary to further develop manufacturing processes, arrange for contract manufacturing or build manufacturing facilities and obtain the
necessary regulatory approvals for those facilities; |
|
|
|
the time and cost necessary to develop sales, marketing and distribution capabilities; |
|
|
|
the cost necessary to sell, market and distribute our products, if any are approved; |
|
|
|
changes in applicable governmental regulatory policies; and |
|
|
|
any new collaborative, licensing and other commercial relationships that we may establish. |
We may not get funding when we need it or funding may only be available on unfavorable terms. If we cannot raise adequate funds to satisfy
our capital requirements, we may have to delay, scale-back or eliminate our research and development activities or future operations. We might have to license our technology to others. This could result in sharing revenues that we might otherwise
retain for ourselves. Any of these actions may harm our business.
If our collaboration with Procter & Gamble
is terminated or Procter & Gamble reduces its commitment to our collaboration, our ability to commercialize pexelizumab in the time expected, or at all, and our business would be harmed.
We rely heavily on Procter & Gamble to perform development, obtain commercial manufacturing, and provide sales and marketing for pexelizumab. While we cannot assure you
that pexelizumab will ever be successfully developed and commercialized if Procter & Gamble does not perform its obligations in a timely manner, or at all, our ability to commercialize pexelizumab will be significantly adversely affected. We
rely on Procter & Gamble, or P&G, to provide funding and additional resources for the development and commercialization of pexelizumab. These include funds and resources for:
|
|
|
clinical development and clinical and commercial manufacturing; |
|
|
|
obtaining regulatory approvals; and |
|
|
|
sales, marketing and distribution efforts worldwide. |
Prior to December 2001, Procter & Gamble was generally funding all clinical development and manufacturing costs for pexelizumab. In December 2001, we and P&G entered into a binding memorandum
of understanding, or MOU, pursuant to which we and P&G revised our collaboration. Per the MOU, our revised collaboration provides for us and P&G to each incur approximately 50% of all Phase III clinical trial, product development and
manufacturing, and commercialization costs necessary for the potential approval and marketing of pexelizumab in the
-3-
U.S. Procter & Gamble agreed to retain responsibility and costs for future
development and commercialization outside the U.S. Additionally, as part of the MOU, we will receive milestone payments for achieving specified development steps, regulatory filings and approvals, but will not receive previously agreed sales
milestones and will generally forego further research and development support payments from P&G.
P&G has
the right to terminate the collaboration at any time. Termination of our agreement with Procter & Gamble would cause significant delays in the development of pexelizumab and result in additional development costs. If we were to continue
development of pexelizumab, we would need to fund the development and commercialization of pexelizumab on our own or identify a new development partner. We cannot guarantee that Procter & Gamble will devote the resources necessary to
successfully develop and commercialize pexelizumab in a timely manner, if at all. Furthermore, Procter & Gamble may devote the necessary resources, but we may still not successfully develop and commercialize pexelizumab. We might also have to
repeat testing already completed with Procter & Gamble.
If we are unable to engage and retain third-party
collaborators, our research and development efforts may be delayed.
We depend upon third-party collaborators to
assist us in the development of our product candidates. If any of our existing collaborators breaches or terminates its agreement with us or does not perform its development work under an agreement in a timely manner or at all, we would experience
significant delays in the development or commercialization of our product candidates. We would also experience significant delays if we could not engage additional collaborators when required. In either event, we would be required to devote
additional funds or other resources to these activities or to terminate them. This would divert funds or other resources from other parts of our business.
We cannot assure you that:
|
|
|
current collaboration arrangements will be continued in their current form; |
|
|
|
we will be able to negotiate acceptable collaborative agreements to develop or commercialize our product candidates; |
|
|
|
any arrangements with third parties will be successful; or |
|
|
|
current or potential collaborators will not pursue treatments for other diseases or seek other ways of developing treatments for our disease targets.
|
If the trading price of our common stock continues to fluctuate in a wide range, our
stockholders will suffer considerable uncertainty with respect to an investment in our stock.
The trading price
of our common stock has been volatile and may continue to be volatile in the future. Factors such as announcements of fluctuations in our or our competitors operating results, fluctuations in the trading prices or business prospects of our
competitors and collaborators, including, but not limited to Procter & Gamble, changes in our prospects, and market conditions for biotechnology stocks in general could have a significant impact on the future trading prices of our common stock
and our outstanding notes. In particular, the trading price of the common stock of many biotechnology companies, including ours, has experienced extreme price and volume
-4-
fluctuations, which have at times been unrelated to the operating performance of the companies whose
stocks were affected. This is due to several factors, including general market conditions, the announcement of the results of our clinical trials or product development and the results of our attempts to obtain FDA approval for our products. In
particular, since August 1, 2001, the sales price of our common stock has ranged from a low of $9.58 per share to a high of $26.69 per share and since August 1, 1999, the sales price of our common stock has ranged from a low of $10.00 per share to a
high of $119.88 per share. While we cannot predict our future performance, if our stock continues to fluctuate in a wide range, an investment in our stock or our outstanding notes may result in considerable uncertainty for an investor.
If we cannot protect the confidentiality and proprietary nature of our trade secrets, our business and competitive position
will be harmed.
Our business requires using sensitive technology, techniques and proprietary compounds that we
protect as trade secrets. However, since we are a small company, we also rely heavily on collaboration with suppliers, outside scientists and other drug companies. Collaboration presents a strong risk of exposing our trade secrets. If our trade
secrets were exposed, it would help our competitors and adversely affect our business prospects.
In order to
protect our drugs and technology more effectively, we need to obtain patents covering the drugs and technologies we develop. We may obtain patents through ownership or license. Our drugs are expensive and time-consuming to test and develop. Without
patent protection, competitors may copy our methods, or the chemical structure or other aspects of our drugs. Even if we obtain patents, the patents may not be broad enough to protect our drugs from copycat products.
If we are found to be infringing on patents owned by others, we may be forced to obtain a license to continue the sale or development of
our drugs and/or pay damages. If we cannot obtain a license, we may be prevented from the sale or development of our drugs.
Parts of our technology, techniques and proprietary compounds and potential drug candidates may conflict with patents owned by or granted to others. If we cannot resolve these conflicts, we may be liable for damages, be required to
obtain costly licenses or be stopped from manufacturing, using or selling our products or conducting other activities. For example, we are aware of broad patents owned by others relating to the manufacture, use and sale of recombinant humanized
antibodies, recombinant humanized single chain antibodies, recombinant human antibodies, recombinant human single chain antibodies, and genetically engineered animals. Many of our product candidates are genetically engineered antibodies, including
recombinant humanized antibodies, recombinant humanized single chain antibodies, recombinant human antibodies, and recombinant human single chain antibodies, and other products are tissues from genetically engineered animals.
We have received notices from the owners of some of these patents claiming that their patents may be relevant to the
development, manufacture or sale of some of our drug candidates. In response to some of these notices, we have obtained licenses, or expect to obtain licenses. However, with regard to other patents, we have either determined in our judgment that:
|
|
|
our products do not infringe the patents; |
|
|
|
we do not believe the patents are valid; or |
-5-
|
|
|
we have identified and are testing various modifications that we believe should not infringe the patents and which should permit commercialization of our
product candidates. |
Any patent holders could sue us for damages and seek to prevent us from
manufacturing, selling or developing our drugs. Legal disputes can be costly and time consuming to defend. If any of these actions are successful, we could be required to pay damages or to obtain a license to sell or develop our drugs. A required
license may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all.
If the testing or use of our products harms people,
we could be subject to costly and damaging product liability claims.
The testing, manufacturing, marketing and
sale of drugs for use in humans exposes us to product liability risks. Side effects and other problems from using our products could give rise to product liability claims against us. We might have to recall our products, if any, from the
marketplace. Some of these risks are unknown at this time. For example, little is known about the potential long-term health risks of transplanting pig tissue into humans, a goal of our UniGraft product development program. Use of C5 Inhibitors,
such as pexelizumab and eculizumab, is associated with an increased risk for infection with Neisseria bacteria. One patient in our eculizumab membranous nephritis trials became infected with Neisseria bacteria. Serious cases of Neisseria infection
can result in brain damage, loss of limbs or parts of limbs, kidney failure, or death.
In addition, we may be
sued by people who participate in our trials. A number of patients who participate in such trials are already very ill when they enter the trial. Any informed consents or waivers obtained from people who sign up for our trials may not protect us
from liability or litigation. Our product liability insurance may not cover all potential liabilities or may not completely cover any covered liabilities. Moreover, we may not be able to maintain our insurance on acceptable terms. In addition,
negative publicity relating to a product liability claim may make it more difficult, or impossible, for us to recruit patients for our clinical trials or to market and sell our products. As a result of these factors, a product liability claim, even
if successfully defended, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
If we cannot manufacture our drug candidates in sufficient amounts at acceptable costs and on a timely basis, we may be unable to have the necessary materials for product testing, and later for potential sale in the market. Either
event would harm our business.
For our drug trials, we need to produce sufficient amounts of product for testing.
Our small manufacturing plant cannot manufacture enough of our product candidates for later stage clinical development. In addition, we do not have the capacity to produce more than one product candidate at a time. We depend on a few outside
suppliers for manufacturing. If we experience interruptions in the manufacture of our products for testing, our drug development and commercialization efforts will be delayed. If any of our outside manufacturers stops manufacturing our products or
reduces the amount manufactured, we will need to find other alternatives. If we are unable to find an acceptable outside manufacturer on reasonable terms, we will have to divert our own resources to manufacturing which may not be sufficient to
produce the necessary quantity or quality of product. As a result, our ability to conduct testing and drug trials and our plans for commercialization would be materially adversely affected. Submission of products and new development programs for
regulatory approval, as well as our plans for commercialization, would be delayed. Our competitive position and our prospects for achieving profitability could be materially and adversely affected.
-6-
Manufacture of drug products is highly regulated by the FDA and other domestic
and foreign authorities, including the need to develop and utilize manufacturing processes that consistently produce our drug products to their required quality specifications. We cannot assure you that we or our third-party collaborators will
successfully comply with all of those regulations, which would have a materially adverse effect on our business.
Manufacture of our drug products is highly technical and only a few third-parties have the ability and capacity to manufacture our drug products for our development and commercialization needs. We can not assure you that these
potential third-party collaborators will agree to manufacture our products on our behalf on commercially reasonable terms. If we do achieve agreement from one or more third parties to manufacture our drug products, we can not assure you that they
will be able or willing to honor the terms of the agreements, including any obligations to manufacture the drug products in accordance with regulatory requirements and to our specific quality specifications and volume requirements. Due to the highly
technical requirements of manufacturing our drug products, our third-party collaborators and we may be unable to manufacture our drug products despite their and our efforts. Inability to contract with third-party manufacturers on commercially
reasonable terms, or failure or delay by our third-party manufacturers, if any, in manufacturing our drug products in the volumes and quality required, would have a material adverse effect on our business.
We have no experience or capacity for manufacturing drug products in volumes that would be necessary to support commercial sales. If we
are unable to establish and maintain commercial scale manufacturing within our planned time and cost parameters, sales of our products and our financial performance would be adversely affected.
Other than our agreement with Procter & Gamble to develop and commercialize pexelizumab, we have no arrangements to manufacture our products on a commercial basis.
Currently, we are relying on Procter & Gamble to retain appropriate commercial manufacturing for pexelizumab through one or more third-party manufacturers. The failure of Procter & Gamble to obtain appropriate commercial manufacturing for
pexelizumab on a timely basis, or at all, may prevent or impede the commercialization of pexelizumab. We have not proceeded far enough in negotiations with any other potential partner to be certain of the cost of a commercial manufacturing
arrangement for our potential products nor have we explored the cost or time required to establish our own commercial manufacturing facility. We are aware however, that due to the nature of the current market for third-party commercial manufacturing
arrangements, many arrangements would require substantial penalty payments by us if we were not to use the manufacturing capacity contracted for. The payment of a substantial penalty would harm our financial condition.
If we are unable to establish sales, marketing and distribution capabilities, or to enter into agreements with third parties to do so, we
will be unable to successfully market and sell future drug products.
We have no sales or distribution personnel
or capabilities, and have only recently begun to develop marketing personnel and capabilities. If we are unable to establish those capabilities, either by developing our own capabilities or entering into agreements with others, we will not be able
to successfully sell our products. In that event, we will not be able to generate significant revenues. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to hire the qualified sales and marketing personnel we need. We may not be able to enter into any
marketing or distribution agreements with third-party providers on acceptable terms, if at all. Currently, we are relying on Procter & Gamble for sales, marketing and distribution of pexelizumab. Procter & Gamble, or any future
-7-
third-party collaborators, may not succeed at selling, marketing or distributing any of our future drug
products.
If we are unable to obtain reimbursement from government health administration authorities, private
health insurers and other organizations for our future products, our products may be too costly for regular use and our ability to generate revenues would be harmed.
Our products, once commercialized, like similar products in the market place, may be significantly more expensive than traditional drug treatments. Our future revenues and
profitability will be adversely affected if we cannot depend on governmental and private third-party payors to defray the cost of our products to the consumer. If these entities refuse to provide reimbursement with respect to our products or
determine to provide a low level of reimbursement, our products may be too costly for general use. Our profitability may be adversely impacted if we choose to offer our products at a reduced price. Any limitation on the use of our products or any
decrease on the price of our products without a corresponding decrease in expenses will have a material adverse effect on our ability to achieve profitability.
Even if we successfully develop our products for transplanting animal cells into humans, this technology may not be accepted by the market due to medical concerns or unanticipated regulation.
Our program for the development of animal cells for transplantation into humans may never result in any
therapeutic products. This technology is subject to extensive clinical testing and we are not aware of any such technology that has been approved for sale by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities. Even if we succeed in developing
these products, our products may not be widely accepted by the medical community or third-party payors until more facts are established and ethical consensus is reached regarding the use of animal cells. In addition, concerns relating to the risk of
introducing animal viruses to infect the human species through the transplantation process may also create additional regulatory hurdles for FDA approval. If accepted, the degree of acceptance may limit the size of the market for our products.
Moreover, due to the controversial nature of transplantation of animal cells into humans generally, market prices for our securities may be subject to increased volatility.
If our competitors get to the marketplace before we do with better or cheaper drugs, our drugs may not be profitable to sell or to continue to develop.
Each of Avant Immunotherapeutics, Inc, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tanox, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Baxter International
Inc., Gliatech Inc., Neurogen Corporation, and Biocryst Pharmaceuticals have publicly announced their intentions to develop drugs which target the inflammatory effects of complement in the immune system. We are also aware that Pfizer, Inc.,
GlaxoSmithKline plc and Merck & Co., Inc. are also attempting to develop complement inhibitor therapies. Each of Cambridge Antibody Technology Group plc, MorphoSys AG and Dyax Corporation has publicly announced intentions to develop therapeutic
human antibodies from libraries of human antibody genes. Additionally, each of Abgenix Inc. and Medarex, Inc. has publicly announced intentions to develop therapeutic human antibodies from mice that have been bred to include some human antibody
genes. These and other pharmaceutical companies, many of which have significantly greater resources than we, may develop, manufacture and market better or cheaper drugs than our product candidates. They may establish themselves in the marketplace
before we are able to even finish our clinical trials. Other pharmaceutical companies also compete with us to attract academic research institutions as drug development partners, including for
-8-
licensing these institutions proprietary technology. If our competitors successfully enter into
such arrangements with academic institutions, we will be precluded from pursuing those specific unique opportunities and may not be able to find equivalent opportunities elsewhere.
If we fail to recruit and retain personnel, our research and product development programs may be delayed.
We are highly dependent upon the efforts of our senior management and scientific personnel, particularly, Leonard Bell, M.D., our Chief Executive Officer and Director,
David W. Keiser, our President, Chief Operating Officer and Director, and Stephen P. Squinto, Ph.D., our Executive Vice President and Head of Research. There is intense competition in the biotechnology industry for qualified scientific and technical
personnel. Since our business is very science-oriented and specialized, we need to continue to attract and retain such people. We may not be able to continue to attract and retain the qualified personnel necessary for developing our business. We
have a key man insurance policy for Dr. Bell and we have an employment agreement with Dr. Bell. We are currently negotiating new employment agreements with Mr. Keiser and Dr. Squinto. We cannot assure you that we will be able to negotiate employment
agreements with Mr. Keiser and Dr. Squinto or what the terms of those agreements would be. To our knowledge, none of our key personnel is planning to retire or is nearing retirement age. Further, to our knowledge, there is no tension between any of
our key personnel and the Board. If we lose the services of our management and scientific personnel or fail to recruit other scientific and technical personnel, our research and product development programs would be significantly and detrimentally
affected.
In particular, we highly value the services of Dr. Leonard Bell, our Chief Executive Officer. The loss
of his services could materially and adversely affect our ability to achieve our development objectives.
The
conviction of our former independent public accountants, Arthur Andersen LLP, on federal obstruction of justice charges may adversely affect Arthur Andersen LLPs ability to satisfy any claims arising from the provision of auditing services to
us and may impede our access to the capital markets.
On March 14, 2002, our previous independent public
accounting firm, Arthur Andersen LLP, was indicted on federal obstruction of justice charges arising from the federal governments investigation of Enron Corp. On June 15, 2002, a jury returned with a guilty verdict against Arthur Andersen LLP
following a trial. As a public company, we are required to file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, periodic financial statements audited or reviewed by an independent public accountant. On May 31, 2002, we dismissed Arthur
Andersen LLP as our independent public accountants, and engaged a new independent public accounting firm to audit our financial statements for fiscal 2002. It may be impossible for you to obtain recoveries from Arthur Andersen LLP with respect to
its audits of our financial statements as a result of its conviction in the Enron matter. In addition, Arthur Andersen LLP has not performed any procedures in connection with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2002 and
has not consented to the incorporation by reference of its reports in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2002, and therefore, you will not be able to recover against Arthur Andersen LLP for any untrue statements of
material fact contained in the financial statements audited by Arthur Andersen LLP or any omissions to state a material fact required to be stated therein.
-9-
Should we seek access to the public capital markets, the SEC rules will require
us to include or incorporate by reference in any prospectus three years of audited financial statements. The SECs current rules would require us to present audited financial statements for one or more fiscal years audited by Arthur Andersen
LLP and obtain their consent and representations until our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ending July 31, 2004 become available in the first quarter ended October 31, 2004. We expect that we would not be able to obtain the
necessary consent and representations from Arthur Andersen LLP who have ceased operations. As a result, we may not be able to satisfy the SEC requirements for a registration statement or for our periodic reports. Even if the SEC decides to accept
financial statements previously audited by Arthur Andersen LLP, but without their current consent and representations, those financial statements would not provide us and any underwriters with the same level of protection under current securities
laws as would otherwise be the case. In either of these situations, our access to the capital markets would be impaired unless PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our current independent public accounting firm, or another independent public accounting firm,
is able to audit the financial statements originally audited by Arthur Andersen LLP. Any delay or inability to access the public capital markets caused by these circumstances could have a material adverse effect on our business, profitability and
growth prospects.
-10-